The Supreme Court has scheduled three voter fraud cases to be heard on February 19th. The three cases all revolve around increased mail-in balloting.

The cases involve Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Georgia. The Pennsylvania case was brought by Rep Mike Kelly.

The Georgia case was brought by Lin Wood and Michigan is a case from Sidney Powell. But, even if they win all three it is not going to change anything. Biden will still be president.

President Trump had predicted that the election would be decided by fraud if enhanced mail-in balloting was used.

In Michigan, it could include the fact that ballots were received over three hours aft6er the time limit. There is now definitive proof of that fact after the Gateway Pundit released a video of the delivery.

Even though they won’t change the election results, these cases are important. That is because it can prevent this type of behavior during future elections. Otherwise, we are talking about perpetual cheating and a one party rule.

The most important thing that could come out of this is the Supreme Court ruling that only state legislatures can set election rules and not crooked SOSs such as Brad Raffensperger.

True, blue states can just pass the mail-in ballot through the legislature but Republicans are never going to win in California or New York, so that won’t matter. But criminals within the Republican party can’t put the fix in like was done in Georgia. No changing of the rules just because the candidate does not go along with establishment politicians.

Georgia has voter ID laws that were circumvented by Brian Kemp and Raffensperger.

From The Gateway Pundit

The Washington Examiner reported:

The Supreme Court on Friday listed several high-profile election lawsuits for consideration at its mid-February conference.

The decision came after the court declined to fast-track all election-related litigation in early January.

In nearly every plea for expedition, lawyers backing former President Donald Trump told the court that if the cases were not heard before President Biden’s inauguration, their success would be unlikely.

But after the court pushed them off, many lawyers said that the challenges were still important and could have long-term implications for election fairness. Trump lawyer John Eastman told the Washington Examiner that even with Trump out of office, it was important to settle the issues raised by expanded mail-in voting.


Steven Ahle

Steven is a syndicated columnist for, The Range and other news websites. He is also an author, whose books can be found on All enjoy a 5 star rating. They are A Walk Through the Willows, Melissa's Song, The Tangled Web, Innocent, The Calculating Corpse and It's All About me.

View all posts


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • If the Supreme Court determines that the election outcomes were in fact bogus because PA, MI & GA conducted unconstitutional elections, then could we sue either individually or as a class action all media that sensor any reference to the election being unconstitutional and that Biden is not a legitimately elected president?

    • It would be of no avail. Once Congress certifies the results of the Electoral College, even if the election was fraudulently won, the results are fixed. The ONLY cure is for the House to impeach the entire new administration and for the Senate to convict.

      Even if proven beyond a shadow of a doubt before the American people, just how likely is it the seditious socialist Democrats under Pelosi and Schumer will act according to the requirements of the Constitution?

      • But it could prevent Democrats from pulling this same crap in 2024. That would be a good thing. If they do Trump wins in 2024.

      • I believe you are wrong. Are you a constitutional lawyer? If fraud is proven, the ones found guilty of fraud are disqualified. Trump will be declared winner and their will be tribunal trials for all of these cheating corrupted Dem’s.

  • Finally!! We the people are behind this
    We hope the SCOTUS will do their job by following the Constitutions instead of their personal agenda

  • It’s sad that even if MASSIVE voting fraud is proven and it implies other methods of fraud and fraud in other States, nothing is going to change the fact that we now have a fascist/socialist party in power ready to cement its position.

    The socialist Democrat party will resort to gerrymandering, putting immigrants on voting rolls, rigging voting procedures such as mail in voting and bundling, voter intimidation, forcing Republicans off committees if they rock the boat, trying to expel Republicans for voting the wrong way or for raising points of law, packing the SCOTUS, and creating 2 more Democrat States.

    Be prepared for an authoritarian socialist welfare nanny one party dominated state. May God help us. Remember 2 Chronicles 7:14.

    • For those who do not remember what 2 Chronicles 7:14 says, God made a promise to Solomon if: 2 Chronicles 7:12-16 Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
      12 -And the Lord appeared to Solomon by night, and said unto him, I have heard thy prayer, and have chosen this place to myself for an house of sacrifice. 13 -If I shut up heaven that there be no rain, or if I command the locusts to devour the land, or if I send pestilence among my people; 14 -IF MY PEOPLE, WHICH ARE CALLED BY NAME, SHALL HUMBLE THEMSELVES AND PRAY AND SEEK MY FACE AND TURN FROM THEIR WICKED WAYS: THEN I WILL HEAR FROM HEAVEN, AND WILL FORGIVE THEIR SIN, AND WILL HEAL THEIR LAND. 15- Now mine eyes shall be open, and mine ears attent unto the prayer that is made in this place. 16 -For now have I chosen and sanctified this house, that my name may be there for ever: and mine eyes and mine heart shall be there perpetually.

      Just think about what God is saying to Solomon!! HE will do this for us also. We are HIS people!!!

  • Better late than never I suppose. But … Who will ever judge the “judges” that abdicated their responsibility and allowed our republic to be destroyed by the communists?
    And, will criminals like Kemp and Rafenspurger be charged, tried, convicted, and prosecuted for their crimes against the people and the republic?

  • Like many Americans, prior to this election, I had absolutely no problem with mail in ballots because they had definitive rules for their use and only under very specific circumstances. The system worked as it was intended. That is, up until this last presidential election. The difference is that, like with any plan or system, it will work as planned only if everyone plays by the rules. This time the Democratic Party was definitely feeling the heat of the passage of time and the affects of positive change, which also made the other side nervous, it was decided that it was now or never. Their agenda had to be pushed and by pushed I mean, shoved down the throats of the American people.
    I still believe that mail in ballots or absentee ballots have their purpose if the rules for their use are followed without exception.
    I also believe that each and every charge of election fraud, from rigged machines to fake ballots to mail fraud and the resulting failings of other systems, be thoroughly investigated and shown the light of day to determine their veracity and if found to be nefarious, changes made to mitigate their impact on future elections. If this is not done, there will be no future election that will not be viewed with extreme skepticism and mistrust. How we handle this current situation will speak volumes about who we are as a people and walk the talk about how wonderful democracy is the eyes of the rest of inhabitants of this planet. As it stands now, America is on it’s way to becoming an historical footnote and what’s worse, there are those that are absolutely orgasmic about that possibility.

  • So IMAGINE in the U.S.A the richest most powerful country on earth
    (we go around the world dictating to countries about “elections”
    and personally I don’t think it was the FIRST time
    EG’ CHICAGO J.F.K vs Nixon

  • I see the results of a reasonable ruling by the SCOTUS as being two fold: first, it would serve as the impetus for a new guideline for elimination of future opportunities for voter fraud (things like photo voter ID, elimination of mail-in ballots, clean up of voter rolls-already required by the 1993 NVRA, elimination of any equipment for voting or tallying votes which deal in fractional votes; and, second it would prove that Trump was right again when saying there was voter fraud and therefore, the implied mandate the Democrats claim the election gave them.

Join our mailing list!