General Flynn Was Targeted Because “He Knew About the Billions Brennan and Company Were Running Off the Books”

Gen Michael Flynn’s lawyer, Sidney Powell,  dropped a major bomb when she appeared on the  Vicki McKenna radio show. As many of you know from previous reports, Flynn was going to conduct an audit of the intelligence community and that would have been bad for the Obama/Biden administration.

Particularly she pointed the finger at John Brennan and his alleged use of billions of dollars he used under the table. In an audit, it could show that those billions were spent on programs that might be considered entirely legal in my opinion. Some of that money might have been spent in trying to frame President Trump.

Powell said:

“He was going to audit the intel agencies because he knew about the billions Brennan and company were running off the books.” 

Powell was referring to John Brennan.

Powell took over for Flynn’s first law firm and almost immediately knew that the firm was actually working against him. It must be noted that one of the partners of that firm was none other than Eric Holder. They withheld thousands of pages of exculpatory evidence.

From The Gateway Pundit

Powell began her interview noting at the 1:00 mark that when she took over the Flynn case three things were very, very troubling and egregious:

One – he was not properly informed of what the government had even disclosed to his defense lawyers prior to the plea.

Secondly, the government didn’t disclose a fraction of what it should have disclosed (i.e. the whole case was made up).

And three, he was prosecuted and threatened with the prosecution of his son.  That’s how they coerced the guilty plea.  It was just unconscionable conduct to threaten to indict him and his son the very next day and give them the Manafort treatment if he didn’t enter his plea right then, and I’m convinced it’s because they knew right then the press was going to explode with the Strzok-Page text messages and everything.

5 COMMENTS

  1. David, do you mean, “In an audit, it could show that those billions were spent on programs that might be considered entirely legal in my opinion.”? or do you mean “might NOT be considered entirely legal”?

  2. $Billions? Maybe $trillions, as suggested by Professor Mark Skidmore from Michigan State U., Catherine Austin Fitts (former undersecretary of HUD, and interviewed many times on Greg Hunter’s (former CNN and ABC correspondent) on his USA Watchdog.

  3. I’m waiting for Trump to take another step towards shaking the deep state cage by hiring Flynn back in an advisory role.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here