Connect with us

Social and Political

Report: Google Admits To ‘Steering’ The Conservative Movement In Newly-Leaked Audio

I believe it’s safe to say that it has been common knowledge for some time that the mainstream news media along with the Alphabet/Google conglomerate and the social media network giants are dominated by far-left ideologues who have one central focus, which is to control the entire world via globalist manipulation.

They’ve gotten to the place where they don’t even attempt to conceal their disdain for conservative ideals, as recent audio files have been leaked to sources who were able to disclose them publicly.

From Breitbart:

Google’s senior director of U.S. public policy, Adam Kovacevich appeared to describe the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) as a “sideshow Circus,” in a leaked audio recording in which he also argued that Google should remain a sponsor of the conference to “steer” the conservative movement “away from nationalistic and incendiary comments.”

The comments came to light in leaked audio files allegedly of a company-wide meeting at Google, part of which is now exclusively reported by Breitbart News. Another part of the transcript was released last Friday on Tucker Carlson Tonight, while further snippets revealing Google’s funding of establishment conservative think-tanks were published by the left-leaning tech magazine Wired in December.

The alleged meeting took place in the wake of Google’s sponsorship of CPAC in 2018, which triggered an internal rebellion from left-wing employees of the tech giant. Breitbart News exclusively reported on the revolt at the time, in which radical left-wingers inside Google accused CPAC of “ethno-nationalism” and “hate.”

Google has not denied the authenticity of the leaked material.

In the clips, the transcripts of which are posted in full below, Kovacevich portrayed CPAC as a conference with a “dual identity,” one being a “premier gathering” that features a “whole swath of conservatives,” including “national security conservatives, economic conservatives, libertarians, the Log Cabin Republicans, deficit hawks, small government advocates.”

Yeah, it’s a great question Greg. I appreciate the question. I think one of the big themes – I think picking up on your question – that I saw in some internal listservs and one of the Dory questions focused on the question of the other speakers, right? What are we saying in terms of sponsoring a conference where you have sort of incendiary speakers, right, and I think it’s a very valid question, one we’ve talked a lot about here. I think, to be candid, one of the challenges we face with CPAC is that the conference itself has a kind of a dual identity. So on the one hand, it’s really the premier gathering of sort of big-tent conservatives. Especially in non-presidential years it sort of in some ways takes the place of the annual Republican National Convention. You have a whole swath of conservatives: national security conservatives, economic conservatives, libertarians, the Log Cabin Republicans, deficit hawks, small government advocates who attend the conference. The conference is attended by about 10,000 people. And so one of the other things is that the Republican Party and I think conservatism, in general, is also going through a lot of internal debates about what it should be, right, what should be sort of the position of the party. And I think that’s one that we should be involved in because we, I think, want probably — the majority of Googlers would want to steer conservatives and Republicans more towards a message of liberty and freedom and away from the more sort of nationalistic incendiary comments, nativist comments and things like that. But it has been a very valuable place for us to reach a lot of the people and the big tent of conservatism.

On the other hand, and sort of to get to the point of the dual identity, in recent years with CPAC there has also been this kind of sideshow circus-like element, right, that I think the CPAC organizers have intentionally cultivated sometimes, inviting outrageous figures that say incendiary and offensive things, I think in order to draw more attention and controversy to the conference. I want to be clear that we don’t agree with those things, right? We abhor and rebuke the offensive things that are said at the conference. Those things obviously don’t align with Google’s values and our approach. And I think that it’s challenging for us to reconcile those two identities of CPAC. I think one of the things that — we also face this question in other areas, by the way. So in the realm of sort of politics, there’s always going to — there’s often going to be someone at some event we sponsor who will say something we don’t agree with. Last year, a group that we support, the New America Foundation, had your guys’s, one of your Senators, Elizabeth Warren. She spoke, and she called for the breakup of Google at that [laughter] conference, right? The conference of an organization we support. Obviously we don’t support that position.

One of the other things we’re dealing with is also growing negative attention from the conservative media which is influential among those same Republicans who control government. We have sites like Breitbart and Daily Caller and Fox News who have been focusing on some of the tensions that we Googlers feel internally around — many of which became public after the Damore memo. And I think some of those media outlets are actively pushing the storyline that Google is biased against conservatives. And of course we aim to build products for everyone but if that notion becomes accepted among conservative and Republican policymakers, that could be harmful to our mission of building products for everyone. So one of the things we say out on our team is, in order to count on an ally in the political realm you have to make an ally. If we want policymakers to help us when we have a bad bill or a regulation pending, we have to build relationships with them ahead of time. I think part of our work in the DC office and across all of our team is building relationships not just with the people in power but also with the people who influence them.

Questioner: Okay. Second question is– you mentioned Breitbart and The Daily Caller a couple of times before in the talk. Are we orienting our public image so that we will receive less negative and maybe more positive press from sites like Breitbart and Daily Caller?

Kovacevich: I think it’s a complicated question. I mean, I think at a certain point our values are our values, right? Google stands for inclusiveness, we stand for tolerance, we stand for building products for everyone, and if certain outlets don’t like that, we are probably going to be at odds with them perpetually, right? On the other hand, sometimes some outlets and others just state blatant kind of mistruths, right, or they’ll shade something in sort of the most– you know, that has a legitimate explanation, they’ll shade something in sort of the most negative light possible, and that’s something that we try to avoid, if we can, consistent with our values. I think– and I want to probably wrap up because we’re almost at the hour– look, I appreciate that this is hard and I know that our sponsorship of this has caused pain, disappointment to many of you and we understand that, and I think appreciate those of you who have spoken up about that. I value that Google is the kind of company where people can voice their disappointment and their hopes for how the company can stay true to its ideals going forward in the future. We certainly didn’t mean to cause pain or that kind of disappointment in people. And we really do value the feedback and the input.

 

Source: Breitbart News

The news media has devolved into a completely political spin machine favoring only socialistic and globalist ideals, and anything that favors conservative, or, Heaven forbid, favors President Trump, is totally taboo.

For researchers, the search engines are deliberately being skewed to steer their efforts to find liberal views and positions first on the list and to push conservative ideals so far down the list as to be undiscoverable by the average person.

I think the sentiments echoed in these transcripts are a clear indicator of the disdain the left has for conservative principles. Their intentions are now in plain sight, and they have stopped any pretense of tolerance.

 


 

To try Amazing and All Natural supplements that our founder David J Harris Jr had developed, click here!

My book is here!  And I personally handed a copy to our President at the White House!!! I hope you enjoy it !

BOOK – Why I Couldn't Stay Silent

Thank you for writing the foreword for it!!!

Follow David on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Patreon and YouTube @DavidJHarrisJr

Advertisements

Social and Political

REPORT: Fact-Checking Alabama’s Latest Abortion Ban Bill – 9 Things We Should Know

We recently reported the new Alabama law banning abortion in the article Abortion Ban Law Signed Into Effect By Alabama’s Governor! It has been welcomed with open arms by many pro-life supporters. Conversely, the outcry from the “pro-choice” faction has been predictably dramatic, such as was staged by numerous Hollywood personalities which we reported in the article ‘This Ends with Impeachment and People in the Streets’ – Hollywood Stars Flip Out Over Alabama’s New Law.

In last week’s report, there was some mention made of details as to the bigger picture of the purpose of the bill, specifically to challenge Roe v. Wade. What follows expands on that report, and gives more of a step-by-step fact check of the issues connected to the new law.

This from Breitbart:

On Wednesday, Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey signed what many consider the nation’s strictest abortion law, which makes any physician performing an abortion guilty of a felony in almost all cases.

The exception would be when a pregnancy poses “a serious health risk to the unborn child’s mother.”

As expected, the national media have been critical of the Alabama law and have given little attention to the Alabama legislature’s goal, which is to challenge the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision by establishing personhood for a baby inside the womb.

With personhood, the Constitution affords certain rights and protections, as explained by the bill’s sponsor in the Alabama Senate, Sen. Clyde Chambliss (R-Prattville).

“The way that this bill is drafted – it goes to ask the question of personhood,” Chambliss said during an interview Thursday on Huntsville radio’s WVNN. “The 14th Amendment gives people, a person the right to life, liberty and property. But it doesn’t say when a person becomes a person. Obviously, if somebody is walking around, we know that’s a person. In the womb, do we know if that is a person or not? Unborn babies can hear, they can feel – at what point can they hear and feel and think and feel pain.”

“And so, we need some guidance,” he continued. “We need some guidance. We need some guidance from the Supreme Court. So this bill has been drafted so that it goes directly to that question. It goes to the Supreme Court, hopefully. And we do expect it to be ruled unconstitutional at the lower court. It has to be. It has no choice because they have to follow Supreme Court precedent. That’s no surprise. We know that’s going to happen. We know that will be found unconstitutional on appeal, but hopefully, we’ll have the Supreme Court to take up the matter. And we hope and we feel that the Supreme Court will rule this law constitutional because it gets to that personhood issue that is so, so important.”

With that in mind, there are still questions regarding the politics and the legal reasoning behind the law.

1 – Why was this passed now and not when the makeup of the Supreme Court actually shifts in a direction to overturn Roe or until after the 2020 election?

This is the first year of a quadrennium, which is the first year of a term for members of the Alabama legislature. Traditionally, big-ticket items are passed in the first year’s legislative session, which began in March.

Given the expected controversy of the issue, the leadership in the Republican-led Alabama legislature perhaps saw this as the best time politically to move on the bill, given voters will have moved on by the 2022 legislative and gubernatorial elections.

The next best possibility for Alabama’s legislature to pass such a law might not have come until 2023. Given that these cases take years to work themselves through the federal court system, the Supreme Court might not get to it until 2025 or 2026. By then, the Supreme Court might not be as favorable for conservatives.

2 – The lack of an exception in the cases of rape and incest seems extreme. Why wasn’t that included?

The purpose of the law is to challenge the Supreme Court’s 1973’s Roe v. Wade decision by establishing a baby in the womb as a person. If exceptions are added for cases of rape and incest, then it contradicts the argument, according to the bill’s sponsor, Rep. Terri Collins (R-Decatur).

“The reasoning is the same reasoning, Roe v. Wade was decided that the baby in the womb was not a person,” Collins said at an event in Huntsville, AL before the bill’s passage. “So this bill bases its reasoning that the baby in the womb is a person. And we based it on the fact that in Alabama law, we currently consider the baby in the womb a person. If you were a drunk driver and you killed a pregnant woman, you have a double homicide on your hands. We voted as a state to be a pro-life state.”

Adding the exception for rape and incest could negate the argument that the baby in the womb is a person, she argued.

“The biggest thing to attack it with is to say, ‘What, you’re not going to include rape and incest?’” Collins said. “Well, how do we say, ‘The baby inside is a person unless they’re conceived in rape or incest’? If that amendment was to get on the bill, then I’ll kill the bill because it won’t go to the Supreme Court. It will contradict itself.

3 – Gov. Ivey said in her statement that this might not even be enforceable. So why was it passed?

The intention of the bill is not meant to be enforceable according to its proponents, but a legal challenge to Roe v. Wade and force the court to rule definitively on the personhood status of the baby in the womb.

4 – Would Alabama women be arrested under this law if they procured an abortion in another state?

No. As written, the law makes the activities of abortion physician illegal. The state of Alabama would not have jurisdiction of what takes places in other states.

5 – Does this bill imprison women who induced abortion on themselves?

No. Its sole focus is on the provider.

6 – Does it make it a felony for women, or just the abortion provider?

Just the provider.

7 – Would this make it illegal for a person to prescribe the Morning-After pill since one would only take that if they thought they were pregnant, and this bill makes abortion illegal from the moment a woman suspects she’s pregnant?

The Morning-After pill, as prescribed, is legally considered birth control and not a form of abortion.

“The decision was based on someone in utero, someone pregnant so we don’t get into conception. We don’t get into birth control,” Collins explained. “We don’t get into the morning-after pill, but in utero, which is the language they used that when a woman is pregnant. This bill criminalizes abortion through the doctor. And not the woman, but the doctor.”

8 – What makes this bill different from so-called “heartbeat” bills passed in other states, like Georgia?

Georgia’s law bans abortions after a physician is able to detect “a fetal heartbeat in the womb.” That can usually be at six weeks, which is before many women realize they are pregnant. In Alabama’s law, doctors cannot perform an abortion once a fetus is “in utero.”

9 – Does this bill make it harder for pro-lifers to win in 2020?

That perhaps depends on the precinct. The block of voters many political watchers fear will be turned off by the Alabama law are suburban women.

However, given the controversial actions of the New York State legislature, and the statement of Gov. Ralph Northam (D-VA), the issue has made somewhat of a comeback.

Although Democrats may attempt to weaponize the state of Alabama’s actions politically, it will force the future Democratic presidential nominee to answer to questions about their party’s view on the issue.

Abortion is a get-out-the-vote hot-button issue for both parties, and one would have to assume it would have been at the forefront with or without the actions of the Alabama legislature.

Source: Breitbart News

I happen to be one of those who support the new law. I believe it’s long overdue. When Roe v. Wade was handed down, to a certain degree, people could claim ignorance of what happens in a woman’s womb. With today’s advances in medical scans and the like, there is no room left for those who claim that the baby inside is just a “clump of cells” or has the same significance as a tumor. Another widely accepted fact is that the body of the child is an entirely separate entity from the body of the mother. All of the baby’s systems are totally separate from the mother, and DNA samples prove conclusively that each is a totally independent person.

This website owes its existence to the man, David J Harris Jr, and his passionate support of the right to life of the unborn. Those of us who work with him support him fully in this matter, and we hope to find others sympathetic to the cause of preserving life in the womb. If you share our conviction, we ask that you use the information and details of the things we share here to help our great nation turn from its wicked ways and return to the original principles and patterns laid out for us first of all in the Holy Bible and then by the Constitution of these United States. The corruption and depravity that has been sown into our great country must be rooted out, and to ban abortion would be a massive step in the right direction. Please share these articles with friends and neighbors. The task is enormous, but together we can Make America Great Again.

 


 

To try Amazing and All Natural supplements that our founder David J Harris Jr had developed, click here!

My book is here!  And I personally handed a copy to our President at the White House!!! I hope you enjoy it !

BOOK – Why I Couldn't Stay Silent

Thank you for writing the foreword for it!!!

Follow David on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Patreon and YouTube @DavidJHarrisJr

Advertisements
Continue Reading

Social and Political

CNN’s Fake News Anchor Jim Acosta Spreads Misquote from Trump Immigration Speech

Jim Acosta continued to ride his perch atop the Fake News chariot by deliberately misquoting a part of President Trump’s immigration speech this past Thursday and then spreading the misinformation as fact. (You can see our report of the event and watch the video of President Trump’s presentation in the article President Trump Announces Details Of Merit-Based Immigration Reform.)

This from Breitbart:

CNN’s chief White House correspondent Jim Acosta on Thursday misquoted a portion of President Donald Trump’s immigration speech and was quickly met with a fact-check by a Breitbart News reporter.

Speaking in the Rose Garden, President Donald Trump unveiled immigration reform proposals aimed at increasing the quota for skilled workers. During his remarks, the president assailed some asylum seekers’ abuses of the country’s immigration system. “Our nation has a proud history of affording protection to those fleeing government persecutions. Unfortunately, legitimate asylum seekers are being displaced by those lodging frivolous claims,” he said.

Acosta promptly accused the president of portraying all asylum claims as unmerited, misquoting him on social media: “Trump in Rose Garden speech paints asylum seekers with broad brush accusing them of misleading immigration authorities at border: ‘These are frivolous claims.’”

Moments later, Breitbart News White House correspondent Charlie Spiering replied directly to Acosta by sharing President Trump’s full quote, which highlighted that “legitimate asylum seekers are being displaced by those lodging frivolous claims.”

Acosta did not acknowledge that he had misquoted the president after Spiering’s correction.

As Breitbart News’ John Binder reported, foreign nationals seeking asylum in the U.S. evade immediate deportation after claiming credible fear in 88 percent of cases, according to the Department of Justice. Yet, only 50 percent of the foreign nationals who evade immediate deportation by claiming credible fear end up filing for asylum status following there released into the country.

Source: Breitbart News

It’s one of those times when one has to wonder where Acosta really stands. Is he really that ignorant to think people won’t notice, or is he just being a puppet who does and says whatever the puppetmasters behind the scenes command?

It reminds me of the saying that defines insanity as doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a different outcome or result. He’s been banging his head against the Trump wall for over two years, yet he keeps running into dead ends, or worse yet, vying for the top spot with AOC for saying dumb things.

For now, it seems all we can do is sit back and watch the fireworks and wait for him to step into another pile of doo-doo.

 


 

To try Amazing and All Natural supplements that our founder David J Harris Jr had developed, click here!

My book is here!  And I personally handed a copy to our President at the White House!!! I hope you enjoy it !

BOOK – Why I Couldn't Stay Silent

Thank you for writing the foreword for it!!!

Follow David on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Patreon and YouTube @DavidJHarrisJr

Advertisements
Continue Reading

Social and Political

CAIR is Calling the Shots? They’re Openly Threatening to Silence and De-platform Critics

Social media seems to be in the pocket of the Left, along with broadcast media. Any content that is deemed by the left to be too conservative (even if the speaker is telling the absolute truth) is targeted for removal, and the originator is likely to be banned from the platform without recourse. We saw a lot of shadow-banning and other situations in which conservative reporters and pundits were severely censored around last year’s midterm elections, but even though we are over a year away from the 2020 election cycle their banning and censoring is ramping up to levels not previously seen. What makes it particularly alarming is that some of the most radical of the groups who align themselves with the left’s agenda are openly rejoicing over silencing conservative voices.

This from TGP

The liberal media and far left groups claim Joey is far right or alt-right. Gibson supports a pathway to citizenship for non-criminal illegal immigrants. He supports decriminalization of marijuana, and same-sex marriage.[18] Gibson advocates for establishment of term limits for the U.S. Congress, implementation of a national sales tax, and abolition of the Internal Revenue Service. Joey is Irish and Japanese.

This weekend the Council for Islamic Relations, Oregon Chapter celebrated after joey Gibson was banned from Stripe. He can no longer accept credit card donations through the donations website.

CAIR, Oregon cheered the news and celebrated its efforts to ban Joey Gibson from making a living.

CAIR was reportedly behind the banning of other conservatives including Laura Loomer from Twitter.

According to the Center for Security Policy CAIR is a front for the Hamas terrorist group. But for some reason CAIR has more clout with the tech giants than conservative Americans.

This is reprehensible!
The radical group campaigns companies to ban conservatives and then openly celebrates when they are banned.

This seems a bit strange to most Americans for a religious group.

How the hell did this happen in America?

Michelle Malkin weighed in on the gloating by this sick and twisted group they cheers the silencing of Americans!

 

Source: The Gateway Pundit

Sometimes I think there are too many Americans who still have their heads in the sand when it comes to how determined the practitioners of sharia are to erase the presence of all “infidels” and achieve total domination over the USA. In all honesty, it’s really only been since Donald Trump assumed his position in the Oval Office that I got more interested in politics and national affairs. I could see that the country was dominated by the left’s ideology and morals, but felt somewhat helpless when it came to having any influence to facilitate change.

Since becoming acquainted with David Harris Jr., however, I’ve been handed an opportunity to speak up and add my agreement to his observations. We hope that any of you who see these articles will share them with your friends and neighbors. Enough of us banded together can defeat the enemy and join our president to help Make America Great Again!

 


 

To try Amazing and All Natural supplements that our founder David J Harris Jr had developed, click here!

My book is here!  And I personally handed a copy to our President at the White House!!! I hope you enjoy it !

BOOK – Why I Couldn't Stay Silent

Thank you for writing the foreword for it!!!

Follow David on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Patreon and YouTube @DavidJHarrisJr

Advertisements
Continue Reading

Trending Now