Connect with us

Social and Political

Even NYT Reports That Hunter Biden Was Paid by Ukrainians While Daddy Joe Was Vice President

Corruption and special treatment are being exposed in the lives of numerous present and former government officials. A few hours ago we shared an article that spoke about Chelsea Clinton getting vast sums of money for no other reason than the fact that she’s Bill and Hillary’s daughter. It’s reported that she already has accumulated over 15 million dollars, and draws hundreds of thousands of dollars per year for her attendance to eight meetings a year as a figurehead board member of two different companies that apparently just pay her just for showing up.

As big as Chelsea’s numbers sound, they are a virtual drop in the bucket when compared to the massive numbers associated with former Vice President’s Joe Biden’s son, Hunter. Due to his father’s influence, he landed contracts worth WELL over a BILLION dollars just from the connections he made in China during his father’s term as Vice President, and now even the New York Times (marvel of marvels) is reporting other instances in which Hunter benefited handsomely from his father’s threats to the country of Ukraine.

This from Breitbart:

Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, was paid for his work as a board member a Ukrainian oligarch-owned energy company while his father was vice president, the New York Times confirms.

According to the Times, Hunter Biden was paid “as much as $50,000 per month in some months” as a board member of Burisma Holdings, a natural gas firm owned by a member of the Ukrainian oligarchy.

Vice President Biden was heavily involved in mediating U.S. policy towards Ukraine. When a Ukrainian prosecutor launched a corruption investigation into the energy company Hunter Biden was board member of, Joe Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees to the country if the Ukrainian government did not fire the prosecutor. As John Solomon of The Hill reported, Biden’s threat would have thrown the former Soviet republic into insolvency at a time when Ukraine was fending off threats from Vladimir Putin’s Russia.

In a speech last year before the Council on Foreign Relations, the former vice president bragged about his successful use of these strong-arm tactics to get the prosecutor fired, saying that he told the Ukrainians, “If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.” Biden then boasted, “Well, son of a bitch, he got fired.”

Kenneth Vogel and Iuliia Mendel report at the Times:

It was a foreign policy role Joseph R. Biden Jr. enthusiastically embraced during his vice presidency: browbeating Ukraine’s notoriously corrupt government to clean up its act. And one of his most memorable performances came on a trip to Kiev in March 2016, when he threatened to withhold $1 billion in United States loan guarantees if Ukraine’s leaders did not dismiss the country’s top prosecutor, who had been accused of turning a blind eye to corruption in his own office and among the political elite.

The pressure campaign worked. The prosecutor general, long a target of criticism from other Western nations and international lenders, was soon voted out by the Ukrainian Parliament.

Among those who had a stake in the outcome was Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden’s younger son, who at the time was on the board of an energy company owned by a Ukrainian oligarch who had been in the sights of the fired prosecutor general.

Hunter Biden was a Yale-educated lawyer who had served on the boards of Amtrak and a number of nonprofit organizations and think tanks, but lacked any experience in Ukraine and just months earlier had been discharged from the Navy Reserve after testing positive for cocaine. He would be paid as much as $50,000 per month in some months for his work for the company, Burisma Holdings.

The current Ukrainian general prosecutor, Yuriy Lutsenko, has reopened the corruption probe into Burisma Holdings, The Hill reports.

Hunter Biden’s involvement with the Ukrainian energy firm and his sweetheart deals with China’s communist regime while his father was vice president were exposed in Peter Schweizer’s bestselling book Secret Empires.

In an interview last month on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight, Schweizer explained, “Joe Biden was the Obama administration’s point-person on policy towards Ukraine. He steered $1.8 billion in aid to that government and while he was doing so, his son got a sweetheart deal with this energy company that — we’ve been able to trace over just a 14-month period — paid $3.1 million into an account where Hunter Biden was getting paid.”

“Suffice to say, Hunter Biden has no background in Ukraine,” Schweizer noted. “He has no background in energy policy. There’s really no legitimate explanation as to why he got this deal with this energy company, other than the fact his father was responsible for doling out money in Ukraine itself.”

“It’s a huge problem,” Schweizer added. “And it goes to this question of corruption and potential payoffs and bribes that these foreign entities were making to the Bidens in exchange for hopefully getting favorable treatment.”

Source: Breitbart News

The saying “Absolute power corrupts absolutely” is playing out in front of us on the political stage nearly every day. Just for fun, I did a little digging to find out where the saying originated, and that specific wording of the phrase is most closely tied to the 19th-century British politician Lord Acton. He borrowed the idea from several other writers who had previously expressed the same thought in different words. A similar phrase is “Unlimited power is apt to corrupt the minds of those who possess it.” I think the scenarios being reported in the Biden family perfectly illustrate the wisdom of the sayings.

Besides Joe Biden, if we look at some of our most senior (meaning, long-term) politicians and legislators (the Clintons, the Obamas, Dianne Feinstein, Maxine Waters, and Nancy Pelosi are a few of the ones who come to mind as prime examples to me) we see individuals who have amassed significant fortunes in spite of a relatively meager salary as career politicians. For the average working person, an annual paycheck that approaches $200,000 a year seems enormous, especially if you factor in the other perks that come with being in one of the nation’s highest elected offices, yet somehow every one of these elected officials has FAR more accumulated wealth, and they seem to have an unlimited thirst for more.

By contrast, we see the example that President Trump is putting on display for America on an ongoing basis. His personal wealth has dropped – a LOT – and he has yet to take a dollar of taxpayer money in the way of salary. Of course, he’s not a long-term politician either, but with his connections, it wouldn’t be unreasonable to expect he could have succumbed to the siren song of extreme wealth – but such does not seem to be the case. I’m sure he enjoys the perks of wealth, but he has done it by marketplace business dealings, not by the kind of extortion we see in the Bidens.

Joe Biden claims he wants to be the president, but at this juncture, it’s hard to imagine putting him in charge of the country with the track record we can follow. I think we could guarantee ourselves a fast downhill slide into the swamp of corruption and national disgrace if he were to be elected.

 


 

To try Amazing and All Natural supplements that our founder David J Harris Jr had developed, click here!

My book is here!  And I personally handed a copy to our President at the White House!!! I hope you enjoy it !

BOOK – Why I Couldn't Stay Silent

Thank you for writing the foreword for it!!!

Follow David on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Patreon and YouTube @DavidJHarrisJr

Advertisements

Social and Political

REPORT: Fact-Checking Alabama’s Latest Abortion Ban Bill – 9 Things We Should Know

We recently reported the new Alabama law banning abortion in the article Abortion Ban Law Signed Into Effect By Alabama’s Governor! It has been welcomed with open arms by many pro-life supporters. Conversely, the outcry from the “pro-choice” faction has been predictably dramatic, such as was staged by numerous Hollywood personalities which we reported in the article ‘This Ends with Impeachment and People in the Streets’ – Hollywood Stars Flip Out Over Alabama’s New Law.

In last week’s report, there was some mention made of details as to the bigger picture of the purpose of the bill, specifically to challenge Roe v. Wade. What follows expands on that report, and gives more of a step-by-step fact check of the issues connected to the new law.

This from Breitbart:

On Wednesday, Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey signed what many consider the nation’s strictest abortion law, which makes any physician performing an abortion guilty of a felony in almost all cases.

The exception would be when a pregnancy poses “a serious health risk to the unborn child’s mother.”

As expected, the national media have been critical of the Alabama law and have given little attention to the Alabama legislature’s goal, which is to challenge the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision by establishing personhood for a baby inside the womb.

With personhood, the Constitution affords certain rights and protections, as explained by the bill’s sponsor in the Alabama Senate, Sen. Clyde Chambliss (R-Prattville).

“The way that this bill is drafted – it goes to ask the question of personhood,” Chambliss said during an interview Thursday on Huntsville radio’s WVNN. “The 14th Amendment gives people, a person the right to life, liberty and property. But it doesn’t say when a person becomes a person. Obviously, if somebody is walking around, we know that’s a person. In the womb, do we know if that is a person or not? Unborn babies can hear, they can feel – at what point can they hear and feel and think and feel pain.”

“And so, we need some guidance,” he continued. “We need some guidance. We need some guidance from the Supreme Court. So this bill has been drafted so that it goes directly to that question. It goes to the Supreme Court, hopefully. And we do expect it to be ruled unconstitutional at the lower court. It has to be. It has no choice because they have to follow Supreme Court precedent. That’s no surprise. We know that’s going to happen. We know that will be found unconstitutional on appeal, but hopefully, we’ll have the Supreme Court to take up the matter. And we hope and we feel that the Supreme Court will rule this law constitutional because it gets to that personhood issue that is so, so important.”

With that in mind, there are still questions regarding the politics and the legal reasoning behind the law.

1 – Why was this passed now and not when the makeup of the Supreme Court actually shifts in a direction to overturn Roe or until after the 2020 election?

This is the first year of a quadrennium, which is the first year of a term for members of the Alabama legislature. Traditionally, big-ticket items are passed in the first year’s legislative session, which began in March.

Given the expected controversy of the issue, the leadership in the Republican-led Alabama legislature perhaps saw this as the best time politically to move on the bill, given voters will have moved on by the 2022 legislative and gubernatorial elections.

The next best possibility for Alabama’s legislature to pass such a law might not have come until 2023. Given that these cases take years to work themselves through the federal court system, the Supreme Court might not get to it until 2025 or 2026. By then, the Supreme Court might not be as favorable for conservatives.

2 – The lack of an exception in the cases of rape and incest seems extreme. Why wasn’t that included?

The purpose of the law is to challenge the Supreme Court’s 1973’s Roe v. Wade decision by establishing a baby in the womb as a person. If exceptions are added for cases of rape and incest, then it contradicts the argument, according to the bill’s sponsor, Rep. Terri Collins (R-Decatur).

“The reasoning is the same reasoning, Roe v. Wade was decided that the baby in the womb was not a person,” Collins said at an event in Huntsville, AL before the bill’s passage. “So this bill bases its reasoning that the baby in the womb is a person. And we based it on the fact that in Alabama law, we currently consider the baby in the womb a person. If you were a drunk driver and you killed a pregnant woman, you have a double homicide on your hands. We voted as a state to be a pro-life state.”

Adding the exception for rape and incest could negate the argument that the baby in the womb is a person, she argued.

“The biggest thing to attack it with is to say, ‘What, you’re not going to include rape and incest?’” Collins said. “Well, how do we say, ‘The baby inside is a person unless they’re conceived in rape or incest’? If that amendment was to get on the bill, then I’ll kill the bill because it won’t go to the Supreme Court. It will contradict itself.

3 – Gov. Ivey said in her statement that this might not even be enforceable. So why was it passed?

The intention of the bill is not meant to be enforceable according to its proponents, but a legal challenge to Roe v. Wade and force the court to rule definitively on the personhood status of the baby in the womb.

4 – Would Alabama women be arrested under this law if they procured an abortion in another state?

No. As written, the law makes the activities of abortion physician illegal. The state of Alabama would not have jurisdiction of what takes places in other states.

5 – Does this bill imprison women who induced abortion on themselves?

No. Its sole focus is on the provider.

6 – Does it make it a felony for women, or just the abortion provider?

Just the provider.

7 – Would this make it illegal for a person to prescribe the Morning-After pill since one would only take that if they thought they were pregnant, and this bill makes abortion illegal from the moment a woman suspects she’s pregnant?

The Morning-After pill, as prescribed, is legally considered birth control and not a form of abortion.

“The decision was based on someone in utero, someone pregnant so we don’t get into conception. We don’t get into birth control,” Collins explained. “We don’t get into the morning-after pill, but in utero, which is the language they used that when a woman is pregnant. This bill criminalizes abortion through the doctor. And not the woman, but the doctor.”

8 – What makes this bill different from so-called “heartbeat” bills passed in other states, like Georgia?

Georgia’s law bans abortions after a physician is able to detect “a fetal heartbeat in the womb.” That can usually be at six weeks, which is before many women realize they are pregnant. In Alabama’s law, doctors cannot perform an abortion once a fetus is “in utero.”

9 – Does this bill make it harder for pro-lifers to win in 2020?

That perhaps depends on the precinct. The block of voters many political watchers fear will be turned off by the Alabama law are suburban women.

However, given the controversial actions of the New York State legislature, and the statement of Gov. Ralph Northam (D-VA), the issue has made somewhat of a comeback.

Although Democrats may attempt to weaponize the state of Alabama’s actions politically, it will force the future Democratic presidential nominee to answer to questions about their party’s view on the issue.

Abortion is a get-out-the-vote hot-button issue for both parties, and one would have to assume it would have been at the forefront with or without the actions of the Alabama legislature.

Source: Breitbart News

I happen to be one of those who support the new law. I believe it’s long overdue. When Roe v. Wade was handed down, to a certain degree, people could claim ignorance of what happens in a woman’s womb. With today’s advances in medical scans and the like, there is no room left for those who claim that the baby inside is just a “clump of cells” or has the same significance as a tumor. Another widely accepted fact is that the body of the child is an entirely separate entity from the body of the mother. All of the baby’s systems are totally separate from the mother, and DNA samples prove conclusively that each is a totally independent person.

This website owes its existence to the man, David J Harris Jr, and his passionate support of the right to life of the unborn. Those of us who work with him support him fully in this matter, and we hope to find others sympathetic to the cause of preserving life in the womb. If you share our conviction, we ask that you use the information and details of the things we share here to help our great nation turn from its wicked ways and return to the original principles and patterns laid out for us first of all in the Holy Bible and then by the Constitution of these United States. The corruption and depravity that has been sown into our great country must be rooted out, and to ban abortion would be a massive step in the right direction. Please share these articles with friends and neighbors. The task is enormous, but together we can Make America Great Again.

 


 

To try Amazing and All Natural supplements that our founder David J Harris Jr had developed, click here!

My book is here!  And I personally handed a copy to our President at the White House!!! I hope you enjoy it !

BOOK – Why I Couldn't Stay Silent

Thank you for writing the foreword for it!!!

Follow David on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Patreon and YouTube @DavidJHarrisJr

Advertisements
Continue Reading

Social and Political

CNN’s Fake News Anchor Jim Acosta Spreads Misquote from Trump Immigration Speech

Jim Acosta continued to ride his perch atop the Fake News chariot by deliberately misquoting a part of President Trump’s immigration speech this past Thursday and then spreading the misinformation as fact. (You can see our report of the event and watch the video of President Trump’s presentation in the article President Trump Announces Details Of Merit-Based Immigration Reform.)

This from Breitbart:

CNN’s chief White House correspondent Jim Acosta on Thursday misquoted a portion of President Donald Trump’s immigration speech and was quickly met with a fact-check by a Breitbart News reporter.

Speaking in the Rose Garden, President Donald Trump unveiled immigration reform proposals aimed at increasing the quota for skilled workers. During his remarks, the president assailed some asylum seekers’ abuses of the country’s immigration system. “Our nation has a proud history of affording protection to those fleeing government persecutions. Unfortunately, legitimate asylum seekers are being displaced by those lodging frivolous claims,” he said.

Acosta promptly accused the president of portraying all asylum claims as unmerited, misquoting him on social media: “Trump in Rose Garden speech paints asylum seekers with broad brush accusing them of misleading immigration authorities at border: ‘These are frivolous claims.’”

Moments later, Breitbart News White House correspondent Charlie Spiering replied directly to Acosta by sharing President Trump’s full quote, which highlighted that “legitimate asylum seekers are being displaced by those lodging frivolous claims.”

Acosta did not acknowledge that he had misquoted the president after Spiering’s correction.

As Breitbart News’ John Binder reported, foreign nationals seeking asylum in the U.S. evade immediate deportation after claiming credible fear in 88 percent of cases, according to the Department of Justice. Yet, only 50 percent of the foreign nationals who evade immediate deportation by claiming credible fear end up filing for asylum status following there released into the country.

Source: Breitbart News

It’s one of those times when one has to wonder where Acosta really stands. Is he really that ignorant to think people won’t notice, or is he just being a puppet who does and says whatever the puppetmasters behind the scenes command?

It reminds me of the saying that defines insanity as doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a different outcome or result. He’s been banging his head against the Trump wall for over two years, yet he keeps running into dead ends, or worse yet, vying for the top spot with AOC for saying dumb things.

For now, it seems all we can do is sit back and watch the fireworks and wait for him to step into another pile of doo-doo.

 


 

To try Amazing and All Natural supplements that our founder David J Harris Jr had developed, click here!

My book is here!  And I personally handed a copy to our President at the White House!!! I hope you enjoy it !

BOOK – Why I Couldn't Stay Silent

Thank you for writing the foreword for it!!!

Follow David on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Patreon and YouTube @DavidJHarrisJr

Advertisements
Continue Reading

Social and Political

CAIR is Calling the Shots? They’re Openly Threatening to Silence and De-platform Critics

Social media seems to be in the pocket of the Left, along with broadcast media. Any content that is deemed by the left to be too conservative (even if the speaker is telling the absolute truth) is targeted for removal, and the originator is likely to be banned from the platform without recourse. We saw a lot of shadow-banning and other situations in which conservative reporters and pundits were severely censored around last year’s midterm elections, but even though we are over a year away from the 2020 election cycle their banning and censoring is ramping up to levels not previously seen. What makes it particularly alarming is that some of the most radical of the groups who align themselves with the left’s agenda are openly rejoicing over silencing conservative voices.

This from TGP

The liberal media and far left groups claim Joey is far right or alt-right. Gibson supports a pathway to citizenship for non-criminal illegal immigrants. He supports decriminalization of marijuana, and same-sex marriage.[18] Gibson advocates for establishment of term limits for the U.S. Congress, implementation of a national sales tax, and abolition of the Internal Revenue Service. Joey is Irish and Japanese.

This weekend the Council for Islamic Relations, Oregon Chapter celebrated after joey Gibson was banned from Stripe. He can no longer accept credit card donations through the donations website.

CAIR, Oregon cheered the news and celebrated its efforts to ban Joey Gibson from making a living.

CAIR was reportedly behind the banning of other conservatives including Laura Loomer from Twitter.

According to the Center for Security Policy CAIR is a front for the Hamas terrorist group. But for some reason CAIR has more clout with the tech giants than conservative Americans.

This is reprehensible!
The radical group campaigns companies to ban conservatives and then openly celebrates when they are banned.

This seems a bit strange to most Americans for a religious group.

How the hell did this happen in America?

Michelle Malkin weighed in on the gloating by this sick and twisted group they cheers the silencing of Americans!

 

Source: The Gateway Pundit

Sometimes I think there are too many Americans who still have their heads in the sand when it comes to how determined the practitioners of sharia are to erase the presence of all “infidels” and achieve total domination over the USA. In all honesty, it’s really only been since Donald Trump assumed his position in the Oval Office that I got more interested in politics and national affairs. I could see that the country was dominated by the left’s ideology and morals, but felt somewhat helpless when it came to having any influence to facilitate change.

Since becoming acquainted with David Harris Jr., however, I’ve been handed an opportunity to speak up and add my agreement to his observations. We hope that any of you who see these articles will share them with your friends and neighbors. Enough of us banded together can defeat the enemy and join our president to help Make America Great Again!

 


 

To try Amazing and All Natural supplements that our founder David J Harris Jr had developed, click here!

My book is here!  And I personally handed a copy to our President at the White House!!! I hope you enjoy it !

BOOK – Why I Couldn't Stay Silent

Thank you for writing the foreword for it!!!

Follow David on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Patreon and YouTube @DavidJHarrisJr

Advertisements
Continue Reading

Trending Now