Why Adam Schiff Went From Demanding The Whistleblower Testify To Lying About Need For Anonymity

The Left has gone nuts over the public repeating of the so-called whistleblower’s name, with social media companies suspending or closing down user’s accounts and unpublishing pages.  Our own David Harris Jr.’s Facebook page was removed over stories being written that contained the whistleblower’s name.

All this, despite the fact that no one outside of the Inspector General is blocked by law from mentioning a whistleblower’s name.

And now we find out that the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), last Wednesday, which is chaired by Representative Adam Schiff (D-CA), published the unredacted name of the so-called whistleblower who got involved just to help launch impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump.

We know this now because it has been revealed that the whistleblower, who has a G-13 level as a federal employee, was invited to a banquet co-hosted with former Secretary of State John Kerry, for then-Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi.  Folks, it’s unheard of to have a G-13 level person who isn’t SEC, or Senior Executive Service level, to be hobnobbing with a vice president, or anyone else at that level.  Unheard of.  This means he has an “in” with very high-level people, and that alone makes his complaint suspicious.

From The Federalist:

During HPSCI testimony, William Taylor, the charge d’affairs of the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv, Ukraine, was asked by a staff lawyer on the committee whether the name Eric Ciaramella was familiar to him.

“Does a person by the name of Eric Ciaramella ring a bell for you?” asked Steve Castor, a committee staff counsel asked Taylor during a deposition on October 22.

“It doesn’t,” Taylor responded.

“So, to your knowledge, you never had any communications with somebody by that name?”

“Correct,” Taylor said.

The transcript of that exchange, which was not redacted, was published and publicly released by Schiff’s committee last Wednesday.

On October 30, Real Clear Investigations published a lengthy article alleging that [HE SHALL NOT BE NAMED] was the official who filed a formal complaint against Trump on August 12.

[HE SHALL NOT BE NAMED] (pronounced char-a-MEL-ah) (known as “Charlie” to fired and disgraced former FBI agent Peter Strzok and his lover – not his wife – former DOJ lawyer Lisa Page) left his National Security Council posting in the White House’s West Wing in mid-2017 amid concerns about negative leaks to the media,” Real Clear Investigations reported in October. “He has since returned to CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia.”

He was a CIA asset who was placed inside the Trump White House to spy for the Deep State.

In September, The New York Times all but outed the guy, identifying him as a CIA employee and Ukraine expert who had been detailed to the White House by former Obama CIA director John Brennan.  The Times didn’t go so far as to mention he was there to spy for the Intelligence community, but for what other reason would a man who was close to the former vice president be placed in the Trump White House?

At the beginning of the whistleblower news cycle, shifty Schiff demanded that he testify before his committee, acting like he wanted to get to the bottom of what the whistleblower had to say, but we already know that Schiff’s office had already spoken to the whistleblower when Schiff lied about not speaking to him.  In fact, the so-called whistleblower contacted Schiff’s office first, and not the Inspector General’s office, which is mandatory by the whistleblower law.

“We‘re in touch with counsel and look forward to the whistleblower’s testimony as soon as this week,” Schiff tweeted at the time.

As soon as word started going out that Schiff and his staff actually secretly coordinated with the whistleblower and Schiff’s office urged him to file the complaint against the president, Schiff and his Fake News media friends immediately switched it up and said that it would be “dangerous and unprecedented” for the whistleblower to testify publicly, and declared that he be hidden away, so that he couldn’t be criticized or taken apart by questioning via GOP lawmakers.

To this day, Schiff has never given an explanation as to why he lied about his secret contacts with the whistleblower and never answered questions about his and his staff’s coordination with him prior to and/or after the complaint was filed.

So, there you have it.  Schiff demanded the so-called whistleblower testify in public until it was revealed that he and his staff were behind the entire BS whistleblower complaint.  That’s why Schiff changed course and compelled his friends in Fake News to permeate the political ether with the lie that there is a guarantee of anonymity protection for whistleblowers in the statute when there is no such thing.

What’s going on is an absolute travesty of justice with Adam Schiff lying his pants off, and a compliant Fake News media helping him push his lies to the American public.

When this is over, and it’s fully revealed that Adam Schiff was behind the whole thing, there should be a push for him to resign from Congress, as his actions are unbecoming of a member of the House of Representatives.

3 COMMENTS

  1. time for Adam Schiff to be subpoenaed and if he is capable of telling the truth under oath, once and for all to confirm he knows the name of the “whistleblower” or he doesn’t. And if he lies he is held accountable. Cannot believe that Nancy Pelosi sees that Schiff constantly lies and she attests to his honesty. The Emperor and Empress must step down and go back to California and try to help their constituents and not just their egos.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here