Hillary Now Blaming ‘Fear of Women As Leaders’ For Losing 2016 [PATHETIC]

Hillary Clinton, in a never-ending saga of who-can-I-blame-now is once again accusing deplorables for denying her of her rightful place as president… twice.

This time Hillary is seen having a conversation with former Australian prime minister Julia Gillard about the many hurdles and obstacles Hillary faced from the people she thought she would lord over, including those who are too chauvinist to allow a woman as their leader.  Funny how Julia Gillard, a female, didn’t have a problem getting elected prime minister in her own country.

Hillary bemoaned about women getting attacked for their appearance as a way to belittle them and make them seem unworthy of higher elected office.  Kinda like how her party goes after every woman Republican from Sarah Palin when she ran for vice president with John McCain, and White House Press secretary Sarah Sanders who was recently insulted for the way she looks at the White House correspondents dinner where many in the audience laughed out loud as Michelle Wolf, who claims to be a comedian, attacked Sanders viciously and in a mean-spirited way:

From Hot Air:

The former Secretary of State mentioned how men who run for office “come in all sizes and shapes” with “all kinds of hairstyles” and they go unmentioned because you’re “used to seeing men in these roles” and women are still “breaking glass ceilings.” She also invoked President Trump‘s attacks of women like Carly Fiorina and Megyn Kelly during the election for their appearances, which she insisted was a way for him to “undermine” women.

“There is still a very large proportion of the population that is uneasy with women in positions of leadership,” Clinton said, “and so the easiest way to kind of avoid having to look at someone on her merits is to dismiss her on her looks.”

Women do face a tougher standard when it comes to appearances, but that doesn’t mean that men who run for office get a free pass.  Just Google “Trump hair” and that gets about 81 million hits, or “Trump small hands” for 7.6 million, or “Trump orange” getting 4.2 million links that appear.  At the same time “Hillary hair” gets 1/5 the links at 15.5 million and “Hillary pantsuit” only gets 414,000.  In short, Hillary isn’t even beating Trump with insulting Google searches.  How depressing.  Wonder who’ll she blame it on?

BREAKING:  Report: Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ Slams Door On Anchor Baby Schemes

Clinton also complained that the “lock her up” chant was a reaction to the idea of a woman in power:

Gillard had told Clinton that she was referred to as a “witch” and mentioned how Clinton faced “lock her up” chants during the campaign.

“There is this fear, there is this anger, even rage about women seeking power, women exercising power and people fall back on these attacks like you’re a witch or you should go to prison,” Clinton continued. “It’s not a majority, thank goodness, it’s not, but it’s a very vocal minority at least in my country. And sometimes these tropes are very much part of the press coverage.”

Now that’s a joke.  That’s even dumber than complaining about her losing because of how people insulted how she looked.  The LOCK HER UP! chant was a result of everyone in the world, except Hillary, feeling she got away with serious crimes she committed while serving as Barack Obama’s secretary of state.  Add to that the fact that her entire lifetime in the public eye has been tarnished with a long history of criminality where she and her husband always seemed to be one step ahead of the law.  Name a scheme and the probability is that the Clintons did something similar, from the Whitewater scheme to get around campaign finance laws to Hillary’s cattle futures scam, to the Uranium One pay-for-play deal where she netted $145 million from Russian energy execs (read Russian government) to the plethora of reported and recorded crimes Hillary was involved in over decades.

BREAKING:  BREAKING: Feds Notify Bernie Sanders That Russia Is Trying To Help His Campaign

Hillary was a horrible candidate for president, probably the worst candidate the Democratic Party ever nominated.  Should we even call 2016 a nomination?  She and the DNC rigged the primary against Bernie Sanders.  Barack Obama left the DNC penniless and Hillary offered to finance their operations if they rig the primary for her to win.  She was under federal investigation for crimes that were argued admirably by the FBI director and then let go because of politics.  Americans don’t tend to want to elect someone suspected of being a longtime criminal for president.  Hillary is her own worst enemy, and that is what she can not come to grips with psychologically, so we have this year and a half long pity party for losing in 2016.

I suppose by next month Hillary will be claiming that the dew point being above average in November 2016 caused many people to vote for Trump or some other silly nonsense.  It’s really getting to the point where America should pay for the big boys dressed in white with large nets and straight jackets to have her 302’d for evaluation, because this whiny tour of misery has gone on long enough.  No one goes through a blame game process this long without a few screws loose.

Someone on the Left should step up and help Hillary out.  This does not look good for her or the party.  In fact, the only good thing coming out of this is the unwitting exposing of how Hillary and the rest of her party feel about people who live in a majority of states.  That should reflect quite nicely come this November.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here