Connect with us

Politics

Trump To Nation: ‘How Much More American Blood Must We Shed Before Congress Does Its Job?’

President Donald Trump on Tuesday called on Congress to pass border security funding and stop American blood from being shed.

The president talked about Democrat obstruction over the topic of securing our border and reopening the government.  He mentioned that there are numerous wealthy politicians who build walls around their own homes to protect the people inside.

“The only thing that is immoral is the politicians to do nothing and continue to allow more innocent people to be so horribly victimized,” said Trump.

The president said “America’s heart broke” when they heard of a young California police officer was “savagely murdered in cold blood by an illegal alien” the day after Christmas. “The life of an American hero stolen by someone who had no right to be in our country.”

Trump reminded us of when a U.S. Air Force veteran was “raped, murdered, and beaten to death with a hammer by an illegal alien with a long criminal history.”

He also mentioned that Georgia recently saw an illegal alien charged for the murder, beheading, and dismembering of a neighbor.

“In Maryland, MS-13 gang members who arrived in the United States as unaccompanied minors were arrested and charged last year after viciously stabbing and beating a 16-year-old girl,” said the president.

WATCH:

These are not the only cases of violence against American citizens that the president pointed out for emphasis on his mission to secure our border.  Between 2017 and 2018 ICE has arrested 100,000 illegal aliens for assault, 30,000 for sex crimes, and over 4,000 homicides.  This is a crisis like no other, because not only is violence coming over the border, but drugs and trafficking and sex trafficking of minors is also rampant.

From Breitbart:

President Trump recalled the dozens of families he has spent time with over the past several years, their loved ones killed at the hand of illegal aliens. “I’ve held the hands of the weeping mothers and embraced the grief-stricken fathers,” said Trump. “I will never forget the pain in their eyes, the tremble in their voices, or the sadness gripping their souls.”

“How much more American blood must we shed before Congress does its job?” the president asked. He called on those refusing to compromise over the issue of border security to consider this, “imagine if it was your child, your husband, or your wife, whose life was so cruelly shattered and totally broken?”

“To every Member of Congress: pass a bill that ends this crisis,” he charged. “To every citizen: call Congress and tell them to finally – after all of these decades – secure our border.”

“This is a choice between right and wrong.Justice and Injustice.This is about whether we fulfill our sacred duty to the American citizens we serve,” said the president. He recalled taking the oath of office and swearing to “protect our country and its people” as he resolved, “And that is what I will always do, so help me God.”

During their response to the presidential address Democrat leaders Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer looked like wooden mannequins who placed more emphasis on reopening the government than anything to do with securing our border.  It seemed as if they were both using the occasion to increase blame on the president for the government shutdown than responding to the president’s address for border security.  Chuck Schumer is now famous for his time spent on Twitter trying to blame Trump for the government shutdown, mainly because the world saw the last shutdown attempt as squarely his fault.

It seemed like the two mannequins gave a response to the speech they had hoped Trump would give, full of fire with remnants of charging up a hill, but the speech was a compassionate one where Trump appealed to America’s understanding of right and wrong and the fundamental principle of fairness.  Schumer used his carefully polled line of Trump having a temper tantrum while Pelosi said the president’s speech was full of malice.  Sorry, but the average American is not as stupid as these Democrats think they are.  They saw neither a temper tantrum nor malice of any kind.  The Democrat performance goes to show how much Pelosi and Schumer practiced their responses to a speech that never happened.

Schumer demanded that the president end the shutdown and then they could work out an agreeable solution, and everyone knows the Senator from NY is full of bullschtein.  For Democrats, an “agreeable solution” means you cave and they get what they want and forget about everything you want.  But they’re dealing with Donald Trump now, and not a regular Republican president.

What does it say about a party where their leaders care more about tricking a president into giving in to their demands than being serious about securing our southern border?  By now you’ve seen the plethora of videos of Schumer and Pelosi supporting the need for real border security.  Just last February they both voted for border security, so what has changed since then?  What changed is the midterm elections are over, and they now realize that if they can block Trump from getting his #1 campaign promised fulfilled it will hurt him in 2020.  It’s a hell of a thing to gamble on American lives all in the name of politics.

In the end, the president is siding with the victims of illegal alien violence, drugs pouring over the border, and the savagery of human trafficking, while the Democrats are not, plain and simple.

My book is here! And I personally handed a copy to our President at the White House!!! I hope you enjoy it @realDonaldTrump!

BOOK – Why I Couldn't Stay Silent

Advertisements

Politics

Trump: ‘If I Had One Do-Over, It Would Be…’

In an interview that aired on Sunday, President Donald Trump admitted that his biggest regret was appointing Jeff Sessions as his attorney general, and said that if he had a do-over, the nomination would have gone to someone else.

In an appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press” Trump made the comments about his former attorney general who resigned right after the midterms back in November after a plethora of criticism from the president via social media.  It was at the height of the Mueller investigation, and Trump was openly critical of Sessions’ decision to recuse himself from the probe in early 2017.

In the past, Trump said, “I don’t have an attorney general. It is very sad.”  The president’s disillusion in Sessions wasn’t just about the Russia collusion witch hunt.  He said he wasn’t happy with “the border” and “numerous” other issues that Sessions’ office affected.

“Every President deserves an Attorney General they have confidence in,” Trump tweeted. “I believe every President has a right to their Cabinet, these are not lifetime appointments. You serve at the pleasure of the President.”

Sessions recused himself the day after he was confirmed and sworn in as attorney general, but he never confided to the president that he was going to do so.  The only reason he recused himself was because during his confirmation hearing the Democrats made such a stink about Sessions being a surrogate to the Trump campaign during the 2016 election that they felt he couldn’t be neutral overseeing the FBI investigation into Russian collusion.  Remember, this was before the Mueller witch hunt began.

As time went on, America discovered that the whole Trump-Russia collusion probe was a hoax that served two purposes; a tool for Democrats to use to impeach Trump, and to cover up the Obama administration’s interference in the 2016 election by spying on the Trump campaign and by exonerating Hillary Clinton of the many crimes she committed while serving as Obama’s secretary of state, so that she could go on to win the election.



My book is here!  And I personally handed a copy to our President at the White House!!! I hope you enjoy it !

BOOK – Why I Couldn't Stay Silent

Follow David on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Patreon and YouTube @DavidJHarrisJr

Advertisements
Continue Reading

Politics

MN Star-Tribune FINALLY Reports on Ilhan Omar Being Married to Two Men at Once

This story has been out there for a year, but now The Minnesota Star-Tribune is finally reporting on the fact that Ilhan Omar could have been married to two men at once, and that one of the men might have been her own brother. I guess there was only so long they could sit on the story, since it didn’t go away, but in fact became more noticeable since she filed a joint return with a man she may not have been married to in 2014 and 2015. At that time she was still married to Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, her alleged brother.

From The Gateway Pundit

On Saturday, after several months of this story being reported online, the Minnesota Star-Tribune finally reported that Ilhan Omar was married to two men at once and “possible her own brother.”

New investigative documents released by a state agency have given fresh life to lingering questions about the marital history of Rep. Ilhan Omar and whether she once married a man — possibly her own brother — to skirt immigration laws.

Omar has denied the allegations in the past, dismissing them as “baseless rumors” first raised in an online Somali politics forum and championed by conservative bloggers during her 2016 campaign for the Minnesota House. But she said little then or since about Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, the former husband who swept into her life in 2009 before a 2011 separation.

The questions surfaced again this month in a state probe of campaign finance violations showing that Omar filed federal taxes in 2014 and 2015 with her current husband, Ahmed Hirsi, while she was still legally married to but separated from Elmi.



My book is here!  And I personally handed a copy to our President at the White House!!! I hope you enjoy it @realDonaldTrump!

BOOK – Why I Couldn’t Stay Silent

Thank you @RealCandaceO for writing the foreword for it!!! #BLEXIT #Woke#WeTheFree #WalkAway

Follow David on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Patreon and YouTube @DavidJHarrisJr

Advertisements
Continue Reading

Politics

Supreme Court To Hand Down Ruling On The Citizenship Question On The Census

The U.S. Supreme Court is close to handing down its ruling on whether the Trump administration can include a citizenship question on the 2020 census.  The question of citizenship has been on the census in the past, but the same question today is a political powder keg because of how leftists view illegal aliens living here as “Unregistered Democrats.”  Many are against it because Donald Trump is the one proposing it.  Trump Derangement Syndrome is very strong among those who go against a president’s Constitutional authority simply because it’s Donald Trump.

There have been many legal challenges since the question was announced in early 2018.

People against the citizenship question have cited studies (there’s always a study) that say the question may lead to an inaccurate population count.  I think they really fear the exact opposite.  Leftists have been telling us since the 1980’s that there are 11 million illegal aliens living in the country.  If we know that hundreds of thousands enter the country illegaly every year, with an outlook of one million coming in this year alone, it stands to reason that the number of illegals living in the country is much higher, and leftists don’t want the real number to be exposed.

Another reason leftists don’t want the question added to the census is because the population count is the data that the federal government uses to determine congressional districts, and the number of people living in certain areas determines how much federal funding states get.  This one is particularly despicable.  Leftists want to count lawbreakers who are here illegally as citizens in order to bump up the amount of federal funding for states, creating an artificial need for higher dollar amounts for grants and funding for programs, etc. which is supposed to go toward American citizens.  Illegals should get no federal funding whatsoever, but that money, and the potential for future Democrat Party registrations, is where we are in this debate.

I don’t think anyone can name any other country that you can enter illegally, take social benefits at the cost of its citizens, not register for the draft, get a driver’s license, and then get counted in a government census as a citizen.  The very fact that groups of people are arguing against the citizenship question is a dire warning that something has gone very wrong with a segment of our society.  Can someone please let Satan know that there’s a hole in his fence?

The administration has been adamant in its insistence that including the question is necessary to enforce the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

Leftists, who will go to any length to win any cause, are now spitting and jumping up and down over a potential political motivation behind adding the citizenship question.  Of course it’s bullschtein, but when has using bullschtein ever stopped Democrats in the past?  It’s practically in their platform.

From The Hill:

Critics say that records found on the hard drive of late GOP strategist Thomas Hofeller, who earned a reputation for helping Republicans in the redrawing of several key district maps in recent years, show he was involved in the creation of the citizenship question.

Emails between Hofeller, who died last year, and Mark Neuman, a top census adviser to Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, have been filed in New York federal court as evidence that the question is designed to benefit Republicans.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which has filed the court documents, has pointed to a 2015 study conducted by Hofeller that found a citizenship question would help Republicans in redistricting while harming Hispanic communities.

In Maryland, another lawsuit on the census question revealed court documents showing Hofeller and Census Bureau staffer Christa Jones corresponded in 2015 about the question.  It’s interesting how now many leftists are throwing Barack Obama under the bus to get what they want, as if discarding an old tool that ran out of its usefulness.

Judge George Hazel, an Obama appointee (of course) who is overseeing the Maryland case, has opined that he will reconsider the question of discriminatory intent behind the citizenship question being proposed in light of the “new evidence.”

Oh Puhleeeeease!  The bottom line here is that nobody has said that illegal aliens won’t be counted.  They just won’t be counted as citizens — and there is no legal reason they should be.  They will be counted as illegal aliens, or “non-citizens”, “Future Democrats” or whatever less offensive term leftists accept.



My book is here!  And I personally handed a copy to our President at the White House!!! I hope you enjoy it !

BOOK – Why I Couldn't Stay Silent

Follow David on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Patreon and YouTube @DavidJHarrisJr

Advertisements
Continue Reading

Trending Now