Connect with us

Politics

Sanctuary City Philly Released An Illegal, He Then Rapes a Small Child

Illegal alien Juan Ramon Vasquez was deported in 2009. Nothing was heard from him until 2014 when he was arrested in Philadelphia, but ICE was unable to get them to honor their detainer. Vasquez went on to rape a small child, and he is currently under arrest for that. I would love to do a panel discussion with the mayors of sanctuary cities and ask them how they feel when an illegal they release commits a heinous crime. Or do they not even care? That’s my bet. We hear stories like this all the time, including possibly the most famous case, the killing of Katie Steinle.

From The Daily Caller

Illegal alien Juan Ramon Vasquez was previously deported in May 2009 and resurfaced on the radar of U.S. authorities in May 2014 after an arrest in Philadelphia. ICE agents were unable to detain Vasquez and re-deport him, however, because he was released by the city, which has a sanctuary policy for illegal aliens.

Vasquez committed the rape of the child after his release.

“The facts of this case highlight the danger posed by the City of Philadelphia’s decision to disregard ICE detainers and release previously deported aliens from local custody,” said U.S. Attorney McSwain said in a Wednesday statement, adding, “This defendant received a free pass from the City of Philadelphia and its Department of Prisons, headed straight back into our community, and committed a heinous crime he never would have had the chance to commit had the City of Philadelphia complied with the ICE detainer.”

I don’t normally agree with practices of the past, but in this case I’ll make an exception. Many years ago in Europe, if a judge freed a man instead of putting him in prison, and that man committed a crime, he would be considered equally guilty as the man he freed. As a result, judges were very careful who they freed.

A personal message from David.

How many more horror stories like this do we have to hear about… How many more tragedies do we have to read about after-the-fact… How many more families have to be torn apart before we change???

What have we come to as a country when we have politicians that have been elected by the people, to serve the people, to protect the people, to support the people that elected them into their positions of power and authority, that choose over and over and over again to put individuals that are in our country illegally over the very citizens they have sworn to protect and serve?

We are a nation of laws, and those laws are put in place to protect us. When will Americans understand that when elected officials choose to change those laws so that they do not protect their own citizens but rather put their own citizens in danger? When will Americans realize that it’s time to stop electing those individuals? And it seems to me that the majority of those politicians that are changing the laws to be in favor of non-citizens, even illegal individuals, are always on the  Progressive Left… Otherwise known as Democrats.

Will we reach a point when the majority of Americans wake up? Or will we as a people continue to move forward blindly – hoping and believing that if we open our borders to all and anyone that wants to come into our country that all those that come in will come in peacefully, desiring to actually make a positive contribution to our society? I believe that that kind of blind faith is what will lead to more instances like this story.

When I read stories like this, I often have to remind myself I’m not just reading a headline, and I’m not just hearing about a statistic. I’m reading about an individual’s life that was torn apart. I’m reading about a family that is currently dealing with absolute turmoil and chaos. I’m reading about an American family that are rightful citizens to this great nation, that are dealing with a tragedy that someone – that no one – should ever have to imagine going through… Especially here in our great United States of America.

This could have been avoided. This tragedy did not have to happen. This young child’s life did not have to be forever scarred by this man. This man took, forcefully took, this child’s innocence. Had the politicians of Philadelphia understood the reason for ICE, the need to allow law-enforcement to partner with our immigrations and customs enforcement officers, this young child’s life could have been spared, instead of being forever marred by an experience that no child should ever have to go through.

These politicians should be held accountable for this crime. All politicians that support giving sanctuary to illegals should be held accountable if those illegals go on to commit violent acts of rape, torture, or murder! I bet if we held these politicians to the same fate as the illegals that they are so hell-bent on protecting, they would change their tune in a heartbeat. But until we, the American people, start to make our voices heard, I don’t think change will ever come.

Must I remind you all that these are Democrat politicians that are passing laws that are not in favor of the citizens they are sworn to protect and serve, but they are passing laws to protect and serve individuals that are in our country illegally?

I bet if you tried explain to a child that an individual that did not have a right to enter into someone’s home, but was then given a right to stay in someone’s home by a politician, and that individual went on to hurt, rape, or kill the ones living in the home, the child would ask “what the heck is wrong with that politician?”. I bet the child would also ask if the politician is going to go to jail…

To stay up to date with David’s No Nonsense News, follow him on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and YouTube @DavidJHarrisJr

Advertisements

Politics

Trump: ‘If I Had One Do-Over, It Would Be…’

In an interview that aired on Sunday, President Donald Trump admitted that his biggest regret was appointing Jeff Sessions as his attorney general, and said that if he had a do-over, the nomination would have gone to someone else.

In an appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press” Trump made the comments about his former attorney general who resigned right after the midterms back in November after a plethora of criticism from the president via social media.  It was at the height of the Mueller investigation, and Trump was openly critical of Sessions’ decision to recuse himself from the probe in early 2017.

In the past, Trump said, “I don’t have an attorney general. It is very sad.”  The president’s disillusion in Sessions wasn’t just about the Russia collusion witch hunt.  He said he wasn’t happy with “the border” and “numerous” other issues that Sessions’ office affected.

“Every President deserves an Attorney General they have confidence in,” Trump tweeted. “I believe every President has a right to their Cabinet, these are not lifetime appointments. You serve at the pleasure of the President.”

Sessions recused himself the day after he was confirmed and sworn in as attorney general, but he never confided to the president that he was going to do so.  The only reason he recused himself was because during his confirmation hearing the Democrats made such a stink about Sessions being a surrogate to the Trump campaign during the 2016 election that they felt he couldn’t be neutral overseeing the FBI investigation into Russian collusion.  Remember, this was before the Mueller witch hunt began.

As time went on, America discovered that the whole Trump-Russia collusion probe was a hoax that served two purposes; a tool for Democrats to use to impeach Trump, and to cover up the Obama administration’s interference in the 2016 election by spying on the Trump campaign and by exonerating Hillary Clinton of the many crimes she committed while serving as Obama’s secretary of state, so that she could go on to win the election.



My book is here!  And I personally handed a copy to our President at the White House!!! I hope you enjoy it !

BOOK – Why I Couldn't Stay Silent

Follow David on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Patreon and YouTube @DavidJHarrisJr

Advertisements
Continue Reading

Politics

MN Star-Tribune FINALLY Reports on Ilhan Omar Being Married to Two Men at Once

This story has been out there for a year, but now The Minnesota Star-Tribune is finally reporting on the fact that Ilhan Omar could have been married to two men at once, and that one of the men might have been her own brother. I guess there was only so long they could sit on the story, since it didn’t go away, but in fact became more noticeable since she filed a joint return with a man she may not have been married to in 2014 and 2015. At that time she was still married to Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, her alleged brother.

From The Gateway Pundit

On Saturday, after several months of this story being reported online, the Minnesota Star-Tribune finally reported that Ilhan Omar was married to two men at once and “possible her own brother.”

New investigative documents released by a state agency have given fresh life to lingering questions about the marital history of Rep. Ilhan Omar and whether she once married a man — possibly her own brother — to skirt immigration laws.

Omar has denied the allegations in the past, dismissing them as “baseless rumors” first raised in an online Somali politics forum and championed by conservative bloggers during her 2016 campaign for the Minnesota House. But she said little then or since about Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, the former husband who swept into her life in 2009 before a 2011 separation.

The questions surfaced again this month in a state probe of campaign finance violations showing that Omar filed federal taxes in 2014 and 2015 with her current husband, Ahmed Hirsi, while she was still legally married to but separated from Elmi.



My book is here!  And I personally handed a copy to our President at the White House!!! I hope you enjoy it @realDonaldTrump!

BOOK – Why I Couldn’t Stay Silent

Thank you @RealCandaceO for writing the foreword for it!!! #BLEXIT #Woke#WeTheFree #WalkAway

Follow David on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Patreon and YouTube @DavidJHarrisJr

Advertisements
Continue Reading

Politics

Supreme Court To Hand Down Ruling On The Citizenship Question On The Census

The U.S. Supreme Court is close to handing down its ruling on whether the Trump administration can include a citizenship question on the 2020 census.  The question of citizenship has been on the census in the past, but the same question today is a political powder keg because of how leftists view illegal aliens living here as “Unregistered Democrats.”  Many are against it because Donald Trump is the one proposing it.  Trump Derangement Syndrome is very strong among those who go against a president’s Constitutional authority simply because it’s Donald Trump.

There have been many legal challenges since the question was announced in early 2018.

People against the citizenship question have cited studies (there’s always a study) that say the question may lead to an inaccurate population count.  I think they really fear the exact opposite.  Leftists have been telling us since the 1980’s that there are 11 million illegal aliens living in the country.  If we know that hundreds of thousands enter the country illegaly every year, with an outlook of one million coming in this year alone, it stands to reason that the number of illegals living in the country is much higher, and leftists don’t want the real number to be exposed.

Another reason leftists don’t want the question added to the census is because the population count is the data that the federal government uses to determine congressional districts, and the number of people living in certain areas determines how much federal funding states get.  This one is particularly despicable.  Leftists want to count lawbreakers who are here illegally as citizens in order to bump up the amount of federal funding for states, creating an artificial need for higher dollar amounts for grants and funding for programs, etc. which is supposed to go toward American citizens.  Illegals should get no federal funding whatsoever, but that money, and the potential for future Democrat Party registrations, is where we are in this debate.

I don’t think anyone can name any other country that you can enter illegally, take social benefits at the cost of its citizens, not register for the draft, get a driver’s license, and then get counted in a government census as a citizen.  The very fact that groups of people are arguing against the citizenship question is a dire warning that something has gone very wrong with a segment of our society.  Can someone please let Satan know that there’s a hole in his fence?

The administration has been adamant in its insistence that including the question is necessary to enforce the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

Leftists, who will go to any length to win any cause, are now spitting and jumping up and down over a potential political motivation behind adding the citizenship question.  Of course it’s bullschtein, but when has using bullschtein ever stopped Democrats in the past?  It’s practically in their platform.

From The Hill:

Critics say that records found on the hard drive of late GOP strategist Thomas Hofeller, who earned a reputation for helping Republicans in the redrawing of several key district maps in recent years, show he was involved in the creation of the citizenship question.

Emails between Hofeller, who died last year, and Mark Neuman, a top census adviser to Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, have been filed in New York federal court as evidence that the question is designed to benefit Republicans.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which has filed the court documents, has pointed to a 2015 study conducted by Hofeller that found a citizenship question would help Republicans in redistricting while harming Hispanic communities.

In Maryland, another lawsuit on the census question revealed court documents showing Hofeller and Census Bureau staffer Christa Jones corresponded in 2015 about the question.  It’s interesting how now many leftists are throwing Barack Obama under the bus to get what they want, as if discarding an old tool that ran out of its usefulness.

Judge George Hazel, an Obama appointee (of course) who is overseeing the Maryland case, has opined that he will reconsider the question of discriminatory intent behind the citizenship question being proposed in light of the “new evidence.”

Oh Puhleeeeease!  The bottom line here is that nobody has said that illegal aliens won’t be counted.  They just won’t be counted as citizens — and there is no legal reason they should be.  They will be counted as illegal aliens, or “non-citizens”, “Future Democrats” or whatever less offensive term leftists accept.



My book is here!  And I personally handed a copy to our President at the White House!!! I hope you enjoy it !

BOOK – Why I Couldn't Stay Silent

Follow David on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Patreon and YouTube @DavidJHarrisJr

Advertisements
Continue Reading

Trending Now