Connect with us


“This Is Just the Beginning” – The Violent Left Warns Republicans Of 70’s-Style Bomb Attacks

And so it begins. The American Left has started warning the country of future bombings.

We knew it was only a matter of time when the violent Left went from harassing Republicans at restaurants to bomb threats, but no one predicted it would be in less than a week’s time!

From Splinter:

Do you think that being asked to leave a restaurant, or having your meal interrupted, or being called by the public is bad? My fascism-enabling friends, this is only the beginning…

…Read a f*cking history book. Read a recent history book. The U.S. had thousands of domestic bombings per year in the early 1970s. This is what happens when citizens decide en masse that their political system is corrupt, racist, and unresponsive. The people out of power have only just begun to flex their dissatisfaction. The day will come, sooner that you all think, when Trump administration officials will look back fondly on the time when all they had to worry about was getting hollered at at a Mexican restaurant. When you aggressively f*ck with people’s lives, you should not be surprised when they decide to fuck with yours.

Stop working for this man. Stop enabling him. Stop assisting him. Start fighting him. The people who are responsible for what is happening are not going to get out of this with their happy wealthy respectable lives unscathed. This is a country that locks poor people in cages for decades for trying to make $20. This is a country that is “tough on crime.” Remember? And the ones who make the laws are not going to like what happens when America starts to regard them as the criminals.

This needs to be taken seriously, but with recent history of left-wing violence in America’s cities, run almost exclusively by Democrats, not a whole lot of action has been taken against violent groups like ANTIFA.  And don’t forget how mayors in cities like Baltimore and Ferguson reacted to riots in their cities. They gave stand-down orders to police, and even gave permission to riot.  How seriously can we expect Democrat mayors to take bomb threats against Republicans?  It’s every-man-for-himself, as Democrats can not be relied upon to do the right thing.

The Left wants to go to war to push their Progressive-Marxist agenda on the country, even if it means to act like Islamic terrorists by blowing up innocent people with whom they disagree politically.  They should watch what they wish for, as the people they seek to kill own most of the guns in this country, and they know how to use them to defend and protect themselves and their families.


Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Sex Education! Teach Everything But Pro-Life As Teacher Faces Losing Her Job [VIDEO]

Doesn’t it just figure. You can teach homosexuality, promiscuity, and anything else the left thinks is acceptable in sex education, but you can’t teach pro-life issues. So, a good teacher, is likely facing job loss because she showed a pro-life video to students.


The Sacramento City Unified School District is investigating a middle school teacher’s decision to show sex ed students a pro-life group’s medical animation videos that depict what happens during abortion.

The videos, presented by pro-life organization Live Action and narrated by former abortionist-turned-pro-life activist Dr. Anthony Levatino, show animations of how abortions are performed during various stages of pregnancy. The middle school presentation also included a music video titled Can I Live? in which rapper Nick Cannon thanks his mother for not aborting him when she became pregnant as a teen.

Here’s a sample of the video.

According to the Sacramento Bee, Alex Barrios, a spokesman for the school district, said the videos are “completely inappropriate for the classroom” and fail to “meet the district’s approved family life and sexuality curriculum.” He added the district “will address this matter with the seriousness it demands.”

Parents of children who saw the videos complained to the district. They identified the teacher as Jenny Thomas, a science teacher tasked with teaching about family life and human sexuality. Parents reportedly described Thomas as a good teacher.

So, remember, parents complained because the video was misleading, graphic, biased and inappropriate. And what about sex education isn’t graphic. Is HIV education appropriate? What about homosexuality graphics? Is there no bias in that?

Every thing about sex ed should be that there are consequences to your actions. Abortion also has consequences.

Honestly folks, you can’t make this stuff up.

Continue Reading


Majority of Likely Voters Believe FBI, DOJ Broke the Law to Prevent Trump From Winning

A recent Rasmussen poll shows that 51% of likely voters now believe that the DOJ and FBI committed crimes in order to try to stop Donald Trump from being president and then tried to keep him out of office. 42% of those who responded say they probably did not break the law but only 26% said they felt certain they had not. Even among Democrats the suspicions are rising. 29% of democrats believe laws were broken. Even with the lamestream media trying to hush up every bit of incriminating news, the truth is getting out there. And as we all know that truth is the Democrat’s Kryptonite.

From Breitbart News

The reasons for this movement in public opinion should be obvious to anyone who has paid attention to the cascade of revelations that have come down about the Obama administration’s counter-intelligence operation against Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

As the New York Times reported, through director James Comey’s FBI, the Obama administration infiltrated Trump’s campaign with spies, who spread misinformation. This is on top of what we already knew about the wiretaps, the FISA warrants obtained with lies, the unmasking, a hoax-dossier paid for by Democrats using misinformation gathered by a foreign former-spy  from Kremlin officials, and countless campaigns of disinformation perpetrated against the American people through illegal media leaks.

As if all of this is not bad enough, there is the constant stonewalling from the Department of Justice (DOJ) when it comes to congressional oversight. The DOJ refuses to release documents crucial to oversight. The DOJ has also been caught lying on a number of occasions, including the timing of the Obama White House’s spying operation against Trump.

I have found a copy of the unredacted letter from Rod Rosentein giving Mueller the authority to investigate Russian interference:

By election time this groundswell could become a mountain too high for Democrats to climb.

Continue Reading


Still Think The Media Isn’t Controlled By The Left? Chuck Schumer Orders “Spygate” Coverup!

This is getting more than just a little out of hand. When a U.S. Senator orders a coverup by the media on the dirty little details emerging from ‘Spygate’ then the world has let too much go with out consequence. And when he does it openly, on social media, it’s even more ridiculous. It’s time for Schumer to go.

The Conservative Review has this on that.

First there’s the tweet:

Oh, really, Chuck? Is it really your responsibility to direct the narrative? And if there is no evidence, then maybe you should be directing Mueller to wrap the investigation and present his “findings” to the world. But, I’m guessing that really wouldn’t work out quite the way the left is hoping it would.

Two things:

First, to quote the great Mark Levin, “the evidence is overwhelming” that there was an informant involved in disseminating intelligence about the Trump campaign to the CIA and the FBI. Both the New York Times and the Washington Post reported it. The Daily Caller connected the dots and identified Stefan Halper, a Cambridge professor with ties to the CIA and the British intelligence agency MI-6, as the “informant.” The argument over whether an “informant” is the same thing as a “spy” is semantics. Halper was tasked by the FBI to meet Trump campaign officials and report any evidence of Russian collusion (there is still no evidence so far). An individual who gathers intelligence and reports it sounds an awful lot like a spy.

Second, who does Chuck Schumer think he is to give orders to the mainstream media? A United States government official has no business giving editorial direction to reporters — and, of course, it’s dishonest direction at that. The fact is — reporters are still supposed to use facts — that Trump’s campaign was surveilled and there was at least one individual, Halper, who approached members of the campaign under false pretenses to gather information to report to the government.

And they point out one more thing:

On what grounds did the Obama administration begin a counterintelligence investigation using “police state tactics” against the Trump campaign? “In the end, it is not about who the spies are. It is about why they were spying,” McCarthy writes.

So, really! Is it appropriate for Chuck Schumer to interact with the public narrative this way, especially since there is evidence to contradict his assertions. I can’t wait for the Mueller investigation to conclude. The fireworks should be spectacular.

Continue Reading

Trending Now